<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Shoppers going green for Christmas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/shoppers-going-green-for-christmas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/shoppers-going-green-for-christmas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/shoppers-going-green-for-christmas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/black-friday/" rel="tag">Black Friday</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline news</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/shoppingswoosh200cs1214.jpg" alt="" />No, don't expect to see windmills and solar panels -- <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/2009-11-16-holiday-shoppers-cards_N.htm" target="_blank">consumers are leaning toward a different kind of green</a> this holiday season: cash. Rather than hit their <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/creditcards/">credit cards</a>, shoppers will only be spending money they have (and can see and touch). Seventy-one percent of consumers are looking to cash and debit cards as their primary form of payment for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/holidayshopping/">holiday shopping</a> this year, which the <a href="http://www.nrf.com" target="_blank">National Retail Foundation</a> pegs as the highest level since 2005.</p>
<p>This could be a problem for the retailers.</p>
<p>Sure, you'd think that the merchant fees on credit cards make cash more attractive to the sellers. But, Ellen Davis, a spokesperson for the NRF, says that most retailers have found they can talk credit card buyers into up-sells more easily. That leads to a bigger basket size and more revenue. Done successfully, it should comfortably absorb the impact of merchant fees. James Roberts, a marketing professor at Baylor University, adds that using plastic makes consumers more likely to buy at all, let alone more.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/shoppers-going-green-for-christmas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Shoppers going green for Christmas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/shoppers-going-green-for-christmas/">Shoppers going green for Christmas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/2009-11-16-holiday-shoppers-cards_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/shoppers-going-green-for-christmas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19243062/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/shoppers-going-green-for-christmas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Christmas</category><category>christmas shopping</category><category>ChristmasShopping</category><category>credit card</category><category>credit cards</category><category>holiday sales</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>HolidaySales</category><category>HolidayShopping</category><category>inthenews</category><category>National Retail Federation</category><category>NationalRetailFederation</category><category>nrf</category><category>retail sales</category><category>retail sector</category><category>retailers</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>RetailSector</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the recession still alive?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" alt="" />Monday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average set a new 2009 high, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/closing-bell-bulls-gutting-bears-atvi-ewbc-ge-jaso-enzn-m/">trading above 10,225</a>. GDP growth came in at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/third-quarter-gdp-shows-growth-is-the-recession-over/">3.5% for the third quarter</a>.</p>
<p>However, what we are experiencing is a disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street. Last Friday, the Labor Department reported that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/">unemployment is now above 10%</a>. <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/10/30/consumer-spending-falls-employment-costs-hit-record-low/">Consumer spending for September</a> fell .5%, the biggest drop since December 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is the recession still alive?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/">Is the recession still alive?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/11/07/earth-to-economists-recession-isnt-over/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19230500/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GDP</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nationwide home prices fall in 123 of 153 metro areas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/icelandhouse.png" alt="" />The housing market is still mired in price declines during the third quarter. Prices declined in 80% of metro areas.<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33826643"> Of the 153 metro areas surveyed, 123 still saw price declines, while 30 saw price increases. Overall, the national median price has fallen 11.2% from last year.</a>
<p>Let's look at specific towns and cities with the highest price declines and the highest price increases:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Fort Myers, Florida tops the list with a 40% decline. Median home prices were $98,000.00</li>
    <li>Las Vegas, Nevada saw a 35% decline. Median home prices were $138,500.00</li>
    <li>On the up side, Cumberland Maryland saw a price increase of 19% Median home prices rose to $122,100.00</li>
    <li>Davenport, Iowa was next with a 14% increase. Median home prices were $115,600.00.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nationwide home prices fall in 123 of 153 metro areas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/">Nationwide home prices fall in 123 of 153 metro areas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/33826643>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19230785/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>first time home buyer credit</category><category>home prices</category><category>HomePrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>median home price</category><category>MedianHomePrice</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why are stocks surging to new 2009 highs?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/why-are-stocks-surging-to-new-2009-highs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/why-are-stocks-surging-to-new-2009-highs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/why-are-stocks-surging-to-new-2009-highs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/stockexchange.jpg" width="200" height="146" alt="" />Why are stocks trading at record highs? Last week we had a dismal report on unemployment, rising to above 10%. Stocks should have opened weaker today. Wrong. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BS3TQ01.htm">Stocks surged to new highs </a>with the Dow trading at 10,147 up 126 points. Why the sudden change ot trend? The catalyst came over the weekend when the G 20 agreed to keep stimulus packages in place for their respective economies. Traders interpreted this as a buy signal because it means that more money will be sloshing around the world stimulating business and increasing profits.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/why-are-stocks-surging-to-new-2009-highs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why are stocks surging to new 2009 highs?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/why-are-stocks-surging-to-new-2009-highs/">Why are stocks surging to new 2009 highs?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BS3TQ01.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/why-are-stocks-surging-to-new-2009-highs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19229071/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/why-are-stocks-surging-to-new-2009-highs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIJA</category><category>dollar falls</category><category>godl and commodities rise</category><category>inthenews</category><category>record Dow 10</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A new and improved home buyers tax credit?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/a-new-and-improved-home-buyers-tax-credit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/a-new-and-improved-home-buyers-tax-credit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/a-new-and-improved-home-buyers-tax-credit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img hspace="4" height="89" border="1" align="right" width="169" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/nar.jpg" />As expected, the popular home buyers tax credit has been <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS280904+05-Nov-2009+BW20091105">extended</a>. In fact, it is even more attractive.<br /><br />OK, let's first look at the extension of the current program, which includes a maximum $8,000 credit for first-time home buyers (which is someone who hasn't owned a home in the past three years). The home must be a principal residence and the value may not exceed $800,000 (the credit is either 10% of the value of a home or $8,000, whichever is less). The credit is also refundable, which means that you can still get money even if you do not owe taxes.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/a-new-and-improved-home-buyers-tax-credit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A new and improved home buyers tax credit?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/a-new-and-improved-home-buyers-tax-credit/">A new and improved home buyers tax credit?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/a-new-and-improved-home-buyers-tax-credit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19226400/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/a-new-and-improved-home-buyers-tax-credit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Home buyers tax credit</category><category>HomeBuyersTaxCredit</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BIDding down for Sotheby's, but high hopes for Q4]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/bidding-down-for-sothebys-but-high-hopes-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/bidding-down-for-sothebys-but-high-hopes-for-q4/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/bidding-down-for-sothebys-but-high-hopes-for-q4/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bid/" rel="tag">Sotheby's (BID)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline news</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/sothebylogo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sotheby-s/bid/nys" target="_blank">Sotheby's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sotheby-s/bid/nys" target="_blank">BID</a>) had a great night this week, tripling the performance of competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/christie-group-plc/crupf/nao" target="_blank">Christie's</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/christie-group-plc/crupf/nao" target="_blank">CRUPF</a>). But, it didn't come soon enough to help the company's third quarter results. </p>
<p>The auction house suffered from the art market slump that was exacerbated by the global financial crisis, posting a net loss of $57.8 million (89 cents a share). This is worse than the $47 million loss (73 cents a share) it delivered a year earlier. Three analysts that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601088&amp;sid=a9SFuL8KQDGM" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a> surveyed expected a loss of 29 cents a share. Revenue was off 41% to $44.9 million for the quarter.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/bidding-down-for-sothebys-but-high-hopes-for-q4/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BIDding down for Sotheby's, but high hopes for Q4</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/bidding-down-for-sothebys-but-high-hopes-for-q4/">BIDding down for Sotheby's, but high hopes for Q4</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/bidding-down-for-sothebys-but-high-hopes-for-q4/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19225791/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/bidding-down-for-sothebys-but-high-hopes-for-q4/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>art auctions</category><category>art market</category><category>artwork</category><category>auctions</category><category>bid</category><category>christies</category><category>conde nast</category><category>inthenews</category><category>larry gagosian</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>roman abramovich</category><category>roy lichtenstein</category><category>si newhouse</category><category>sothebys</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fannie Mae will rent to owners in foreclosure]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/foreclosure.jpg" width="200" height="146" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) has initiated a new <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125743289932030933.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_news">Deed to Lease program</a> in which homeowners facing foreclosure will be able to stay in their homes as renters.</p>
<p>During the first half of the year, Fannie Mae has acquired 57,000 homes through foreclosure. These are owners who do not qualify for mortgage restructuring. They must demonstrate that they could not pay their mortgage but can pay rent. The rents paid are lower than their previous mortgage payment.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fannie Mae will rent to owners in foreclosure</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/">Fannie Mae will rent to owners in foreclosure</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19226369/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Deed to Lease</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>housing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[US Senate extends jobless benefits and first time home buyer credit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/us-senate-extends-jobless-benefits-and-first-time-home-buyer-cre/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/us-senate-extends-jobless-benefits-and-first-time-home-buyer-cre/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/us-senate-extends-jobless-benefits-and-first-time-home-buyer-cre/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" alt="" />After haggling since September the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/04/news/economy/Extending_unemployment_benefits/index.htm?postversion=2009110511">US Senate finally passed</a> an extension for unemployed persons and extended the credit for first time home buyers.</p>
<p>The situation for unemployed persons is dire. Here are just a few facts about their current situation:</p>
<ul>
    <li>We have 15 million unemployed vying for just three million available jobs. </li>
    <li>200,000 persons lost their benefits since September </li>
    <li>7000 persons a day are losing their benefits. </li>
    <li>More than 1/3 of the unemployed have been out or work for at least six months.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/us-senate-extends-jobless-benefits-and-first-time-home-buyer-cre/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>US Senate extends jobless benefits and first time home buyer credit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/us-senate-extends-jobless-benefits-and-first-time-home-buyer-cre/">US Senate extends jobless benefits and first time home buyer credit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/04/news/economy/Extending_unemployment_benefits/index.htm?postversion=2009110511>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/us-senate-extends-jobless-benefits-and-first-time-home-buyer-cre/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19225066/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/us-senate-extends-jobless-benefits-and-first-time-home-buyer-cre/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>congress</category><category>featured</category><category>home ownership</category><category>home sales</category><category>HomeOwnership</category><category>HomeSales</category><category>unemployment benefits</category><category>UnemploymentBenefits</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Personal bankruptcies skyrocket 9% in October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/personal-bankruptcies-skyrocket-9-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/personal-bankruptcies-skyrocket-9-in-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/personal-bankruptcies-skyrocket-9-in-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" />The National Bankruptcy Research Center reported that there <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/04/news/economy/October_consumer_bankruptcy/index.htm?postversion=2009110412">were 135,914 bankruptcies in October</a>, up 9%. One third of the bankruptcies were filed under Chapter 13. Chapter 13 requires that the court set up a five year repayment plan for debts owed.</p>
<p>In addition business bankruptcies were up 7% for the same period.The forecast is for 1.4 million bankruptcies in 2009, the highest since 2005. In that year Congress revamped the bankruptcy laws to make it more difficult to wipe out all of a person's debts. There was a rush of filings in the months just before the new law was enacted.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/personal-bankruptcies-skyrocket-9-in-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Personal bankruptcies skyrocket 9% in October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/personal-bankruptcies-skyrocket-9-in-october/">Personal bankruptcies skyrocket 9% in October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/04/news/economy/October_consumer_bankruptcy/index.htm?postversion=2009110412>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/personal-bankruptcies-skyrocket-9-in-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19223573/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/personal-bankruptcies-skyrocket-9-in-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>personal bankruptcy</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[COBRA subsidy for unemployed set to expire]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-unemployed-set-to-expire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-unemployed-set-to-expire/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-unemployed-set-to-expire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/001-blood-pressure2.jpg" />On December 31, the government subsidized health insurance under the <a href="http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-jobless-expires-soon/">COBRA program</a> is set to expire.
<p>What is COBRA? COBRA is a federal program that allows you to continue your health insurance after you leave a company. If you choose this option, you must pay your share and the company's share of your health insurance. For singles it averages about $400.00 and for families it averages $1050.00</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-unemployed-set-to-expire/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>COBRA subsidy for unemployed set to expire</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-unemployed-set-to-expire/">COBRA subsidy for unemployed set to expire</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-jobless-expires-soon/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-unemployed-set-to-expire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19223005/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cobra-subsidy-for-unemployed-set-to-expire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>COBRA</category><category>COBRA health insurance</category><category>CobraHealthInsurance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>unemployed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. loses 203,000 jobs in October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" width="220" height="166" alt="" />Sorry to say that the jobs report for October is bleak. According to ADP National Employment, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f6a43946-c940-11de-b551-00144feabdc0.html">203,000 jobs were lost</a>.</p>
<p>Since the recession started, U.S. job losses have risen from 7.6 million to 15 million.</p>
<p>Here are the numbers by sectors:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. loses 203,000 jobs in October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/">U.S. loses 203,000 jobs in October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19222830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will the Scrooge bankers give their bonuses to the needy Bob Cratchits?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/rich-mean-money-finance-attitude-200cs0126.jpg" alt="" />We have a human disaster of enormous proportions. We have 15 million persons unemployed. Thousands are on the brink of losing their homes. As of this December, 1.7 million unemployed will exhaust their benefits. They may be homeless at this holiday time. Some 400,000 persons exhausted their benefits in the month of October.</p>
<p>Now, as reported in <em>BusinessWeek</em>, one lone economist, Katerina Alexandraki, is asking Wall Streeters to <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/hotproperty/archives/2009/10/should_wall_str.html">give their bonuses to the homeless and unemployed</a>. She has set up a website, <a href="http://bonusforhome.weebly.com/index.html">Bonus for Homes</a>, and started a campaign to distribute the monies to low-income earners and the unemployed.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will the Scrooge bankers give their bonuses to the needy Bob Cratchits?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/">Will the Scrooge bankers give their bonuses to the needy Bob Cratchits?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19217883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bonus for Homes</category><category>bonuses</category><category>give away bank bonuses</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>help the needy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Katerina Alexandraki</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are bank bonuses excessive?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" alt="" />Wall Street is getting back to normal. How do we know that? One gauge: measuring Wall Street's health is the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a25cbLmExCXs">amount of bonuses bank employees receive.</a></p>
<p>Here are just a few numbers that reflect how Wall Street is doing:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) set aside $16.7 billion dollars for compensation in 2009, just a few dollars short of the record $16.9 billion set in 2007. </li>
    <li>Each employee at Goldman averages $527,192.00</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are bank bonuses excessive?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/">Are bank bonuses excessive?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a25cbLmExCXs>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19202457/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bonuses</category><category>BankBonuses</category><category>featured</category><category>Wall Street bonuses</category><category>WallStreetBonuses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />Some of the jobs that have disappeared through this <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/recession/">recession</a> are gone forever, it seems. Even when the market turns, and even gains momentum,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-19-high-unemployment-remains_N.htm"> we could be stuck with a fairly weak employment market for a while</a>. The recovery will take longer than we'd like, putting more distance between now and the top of the next market run. We've lost 7.2 million jobs since December 2007, and the predictions of some economists <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/">that we'll get them back by 2014 may actually seem optimistic</a>. </p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Four_Reasons_We_re_Stuck_with_High_Unemployment_For_a_While'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>    Unemployment is at 9.8%, and it's expected to clear 10% early next year. Then, we have the specter of a jobless recovery with which to contend. "Full employment" is often considered to be an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentrate/">unemployment rate</a> of 4% to 5%, but it could be a while before we get there. The last downturn, following the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/dotcom/">dotcom</a> bust, resulted in a peak unemployment rate of 6.3% in 2003 ... and we're already well past that.
<p> </p>
<p>Why is the recovery going to be such a grind? Check out the four major reasons after the jump. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/">Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-19-high-unemployment-remains_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank loans</category><category>BankLoans</category><category>banks</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>dotcom</category><category>economic growth</category><category>EconomicGrowth</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosed</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>job</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>JoblessRate</category><category>JoblessRecovery</category><category>joblosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>MortgageDefaults</category><category>mortgages</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[KaChing hopes to be the sound of success]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/kaching-hopes-to-be-the-sound-of-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/kaching-hopes-to-be-the-sound-of-success/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/kaching-hopes-to-be-the-sound-of-success/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/benjamin-franklin.jpg" /><a href="http://www.kaching.com" target="_blank">KaChing</a>! KaChing!</p>
<p>It only makes sense to call a company a sound you like to hear. This is exactly what <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN1833223620091018" target="_blank">CEO and co-founder Andy Rachleff</a> must have had in mind. His new company -- kaChing, of course -- is backed by Marc Andreesen (a name often associated with that sound) and Jeff Jordan, the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/opentable-inc/open/nas" target="_blank">OpenTable</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/opentable-inc/open/nas" target="_blank">OPEN</a>), two guys who usually do a solid job of backing winners. But, they've taken on a challenge by backing a company in the financial services industry.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/kaching-hopes-to-be-the-sound-of-success/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>KaChing hopes to be the sound of success</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/kaching-hopes-to-be-the-sound-of-success/">KaChing hopes to be the sound of success</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/kaching-hopes-to-be-the-sound-of-success/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19200281/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/kaching-hopes-to-be-the-sound-of-success/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>facebook</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iphone</category><category>jeff jordan</category><category>kaching</category><category>marc andreessen</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>opentable</category><category>opentable.com</category><category>venture capital</category><category>venture funding</category><category>wall street</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer sentiment drops: savings and debt repayment are culprits]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/consumer-sentiment-drops-savings-and-debt-repayment-are-culprit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/consumer-sentiment-drops-savings-and-debt-repayment-are-culprit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/consumer-sentiment-drops-savings-and-debt-repayment-are-culprit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/shopping_safeway_220.jpg" alt="" />The recession is only over if you ask the right people. While <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/dell-sees-it-spending-ready-to-grow/">some sectors</a> are starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel, consumers remain concerned. It may be tempting to listen to the experts over the average Joe, but the former don't <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/recovery-now-more-dependent-on-consumers-than-ever/">control 70% of the U.S. economy</a>. So, as long as people are worried abou unemployment (which continues to rise), the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/08/consumer-debt-declines-for-seventh-month-in-a-row/" target="_blank">levels of debt they carry</a> and whether they're at risk of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/" target="_blank">foreclosure</a>, the recession will live on in the hearts of those who write checks and swipe credit cards. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/consumer-sentiment-drops-savings-and-debt-repayment-are-culprit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer sentiment drops: savings and debt repayment are culprits</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/consumer-sentiment-drops-savings-and-debt-repayment-are-culprit/">Consumer sentiment drops: savings and debt repayment are culprits</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33343245/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/consumer-sentiment-drops-savings-and-debt-repayment-are-culprit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19198877/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/consumer-sentiment-drops-savings-and-debt-repayment-are-culprit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer sentiment</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSentiment</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>debt</category><category>debt reduction</category><category>debt repayment</category><category>DebtReduction</category><category>DebtRepayment</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>savings rate</category><category>SavingsRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Six facts about hedge funds and family offices in North America           ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/six-facts-about-hedge-funds-and-family-offices-in-north-america/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/six-facts-about-hedge-funds-and-family-offices-in-north-america/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/six-facts-about-hedge-funds-and-family-offices-in-north-america/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a></p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="160" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/money101807.jpg" alt="" />Our continent is home to more family offices and foundations than any other part of the world. These institutions are companies (limited partnerships, usually) that exist primarily to benefit a particular family (as the name implies). So, if you have a boatload of family cash, you set up an LP rather than manage your holdings individually. There are advantages involving taxation and liability, among others.
<p> </p>
<p>Family offices are quite active <a target="_blank" href="http://www.preqin.com/go.aspx?lid=952&amp;uid=45789">in the hedge fund space</a>, according to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.preqin.com">Preqin</a>, with the average family office in North America allocating 14% of its assets to this class.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/six-facts-about-hedge-funds-and-family-offices-in-north-america/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Six facts about hedge funds and family offices in North America           </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/six-facts-about-hedge-funds-and-family-offices-in-north-america/">Six facts about hedge funds and family offices in North America           </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/six-facts-about-hedge-funds-and-family-offices-in-north-america/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/six-facts-about-hedge-funds-and-family-offices-in-north-america/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arbitrage</category><category>distressed debt</category><category>fund of funds</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>limited partnerships</category><category>preqin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer prices rise in September]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/consumer-prices-rise-in-september/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/consumer-prices-rise-in-september/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/consumer-prices-rise-in-september/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/be8cd8c6-b985-11de-abac-00144feab49a.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shopping_target_240.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/be8cd8c6-b985-11de-abac-00144feab49a.html">The Labor Department reported a modest increase in consumer prices in September</a>. The increase in the consumer price index was .2% but it was 1.3% lower than last year.
<p>Core CPI also rose .2% The core index excludes food and energy.</p>
<p>There were price increases in used cars and trucks, apparel and medical care. Energy prices climbed .8% in September.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/consumer-prices-rise-in-september/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer prices rise in September</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/consumer-prices-rise-in-september/">Consumer prices rise in September</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/be8cd8c6-b985-11de-abac-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/consumer-prices-rise-in-september/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/consumer-prices-rise-in-september/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer prices</category><category>ConsumerPrices</category><category>CPI</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Good news! President Obama wants a $250 payment to seniors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/good-news-president-obama-wants-a-250-payment-to-seniors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/good-news-president-obama-wants-a-250-payment-to-seniors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/good-news-president-obama-wants-a-250-payment-to-seniors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />Good news! <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BB2U4O1.htm">President Obama is calling for a $250 payment to seniors</a>.</p>
<p>This news comes on the eve of an announcement by the Social Security Administration stating that there will be no "cost of living" this year. By law, increases in Social Security payments are tied to the cost of living, or COLA. Since there is no inflation this year, there will be no increase in Social Security benefits. This would be the first year since 1975 with no increase.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/good-news-president-obama-wants-a-250-payment-to-seniors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Good news! President Obama wants a $250 payment to seniors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/good-news-president-obama-wants-a-250-payment-to-seniors/">Good news! President Obama wants a $250 payment to seniors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BB2U4O1.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/good-news-president-obama-wants-a-250-payment-to-seniors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/good-news-president-obama-wants-a-250-payment-to-seniors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>COLA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>seniors</category><category>Social Security</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's official: Dow hits 10,000 mark]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_up_up_240.jpg" alt="" />Spurred on by strong earnings from JP Morgan Chase &amp; Company and Intel, the Dow punched through <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE5881Q720091014">the 10,000 mark today.</a></p>
<p>The Dow 10,000 is a psychological level. Very often traders pay attention to round numbers like 10,000. Breaking through often kicks off buy stops and that is an added push to the move. Traders also see strong earnings by two giant companies as a positive for the market and often follow along with the momentum.</p>
<p>Recapping, the market was last at 10,000 back in October when it broke that mark on the downside. The index is down 29.4% from its 2007 peak of 14,164.53.</p>
<p>Do you believe that the market will continue to move higher?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/">It's official: Dow hits 10,000 mark</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE5881Q720091014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196052/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dow</category><category>dow 10000</category><category>Dow10000</category><category>featured</category><category>index</category><category>indices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>